<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: String Theory Proof is Near</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pieceofshep.com/2005/03/string-theory-proof-is-near/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pieceofshep.com/2005/03/string-theory-proof-is-near/</link>
	<description>this is me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:34:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kahns eh</title>
		<link>http://pieceofshep.com/2005/03/string-theory-proof-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-21199</link>
		<dc:creator>Kahns eh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeschepker.com/wordpress/2005/03/02/string-theory-proof-is-near/#comment-21199</guid>
		<description>I know there isn&#039;t physical proof of the String theory. but personaly I find there to be something missing, unpratical with the big bang theory. the idea that a random nugget explodes violently expending matter across the universe; then with just heat and cooling creating our galaxies? it just dosen&#039;t work in my head. 
Einstines gerneral theory of Relitiviy is accurate when understanding Big things like Stars and galaxies. (Gravity) Quantum mechanics is accurate when understanding small things like atoms and subitonic particals. (Strong Nucler Force, electro Magnitsm, Weak Nuclear Force) two laws. but when trying to put both laws together it doesn&#039;t work! they laws are so different it is imposible to put together. 
In the big bang theory you&#039;d need Gravity, Strong Nucler Force, and Weak Nuclear Force interacting with matter to combine into one place. to come from one sorce. 
I believe that tiny bibrating amounts of energy (or Strings) can unifi the four forces. it rewrights and replaces the story and picture of the Big Bang Theory. I hope an expiriment can back up the idea&#039;s of it. 
we may not have a picture of a sting, but sometimes you just have to trust the mathimatical equations. that even though I don&#039;t see a picture I can trust that (if X= a apple) if my math shows x+x=2 apples. that there are two apples... even if I haven&#039;t gone out and counted personaly... something out there is connecting the forces; maintaining life as we know it. I really hope we discover it. 

:) but then again. i&#039;m just a sickly girl who couldn&#039;t even graduate high school. just things i like to learn and think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know there isn&#8217;t physical proof of the String theory. but personaly I find there to be something missing, unpratical with the big bang theory. the idea that a random nugget explodes violently expending matter across the universe; then with just heat and cooling creating our galaxies? it just dosen&#8217;t work in my head.<br />
Einstines gerneral theory of Relitiviy is accurate when understanding Big things like Stars and galaxies. (Gravity) Quantum mechanics is accurate when understanding small things like atoms and subitonic particals. (Strong Nucler Force, electro Magnitsm, Weak Nuclear Force) two laws. but when trying to put both laws together it doesn&#8217;t work! they laws are so different it is imposible to put together.<br />
In the big bang theory you&#8217;d need Gravity, Strong Nucler Force, and Weak Nuclear Force interacting with matter to combine into one place. to come from one sorce.<br />
I believe that tiny bibrating amounts of energy (or Strings) can unifi the four forces. it rewrights and replaces the story and picture of the Big Bang Theory. I hope an expiriment can back up the idea&#8217;s of it.<br />
we may not have a picture of a sting, but sometimes you just have to trust the mathimatical equations. that even though I don&#8217;t see a picture I can trust that (if X= a apple) if my math shows x+x=2 apples. that there are two apples&#8230; even if I haven&#8217;t gone out and counted personaly&#8230; something out there is connecting the forces; maintaining life as we know it. I really hope we discover it. </p>
<p>:) but then again. i&#8217;m just a sickly girl who couldn&#8217;t even graduate high school. just things i like to learn and think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Oakley</title>
		<link>http://pieceofshep.com/2005/03/string-theory-proof-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Oakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeschepker.com/wordpress/2005/03/02/string-theory-proof-is-near/#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>String theory tells me that there is a massive possiblity that we are no longer here, that we are more like a reflection of what we were. Kind of like when the Star Ship Enterprise goes into warp, for a split second it seems to be in about 20 different places at once, but its not, its just kind of like a mtion trail, se we are kind of like a motion trail.
Just the thoughts of a mere country boy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>String theory tells me that there is a massive possiblity that we are no longer here, that we are more like a reflection of what we were. Kind of like when the Star Ship Enterprise goes into warp, for a split second it seems to be in about 20 different places at once, but its not, its just kind of like a mtion trail, se we are kind of like a motion trail.<br />
Just the thoughts of a mere country boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piece of shep &#187; 2005 Recap</title>
		<link>http://pieceofshep.com/2005/03/string-theory-proof-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>piece of shep &#187; 2005 Recap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeschepker.com/wordpress/2005/03/02/string-theory-proof-is-near/#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>[...] March String Theory Proof makes me lucky in google. Podcasting made it to the hip hop world. Giant Steps enthralled me. Mediacrap upset me almost as much as the passing of Mitch Hedberg. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] March String Theory Proof makes me lucky in google. Podcasting made it to the hip hop world. Giant Steps enthralled me. Mediacrap upset me almost as much as the passing of Mitch Hedberg. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
