<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving to the Desktop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pieceofshep.com/2008/01/moving-to-the-desktop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pieceofshep.com/2008/01/moving-to-the-desktop/</link>
	<description>this is me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://pieceofshep.com/2008/01/moving-to-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-14556</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeschepker.com/blog/2008/01/moving-to-the-desktop/#comment-14556</guid>
		<description>You know, it&#039;s funny, but I just moved to a desktop reader, after using Google Reader for the last year. And I&#039;m not particularly liking it either, because the only reason I wanted to move to a desktop reader was that when I star something in the Reader, it just stayed there, and I did nothing with it. With the desktop reader, I can flag it and send it to my desktop blog publisher super easy, which is something that I had been looking for.

And for the desktop blog publisher--I agree with Christian. I often write posts when I&#039;m no where near an internet connection, but also I like being able to have a program in the background, easily able to click over to when the urge to write strikes. Most of my posts are in draft form for over two hours, and I nearly never have my browser open for that long. Also, I find that I spend more time on my posts, and double check my grammar and spelling more than I do when I &quot;compose on the fly&quot; in the blog admin menu. 

(And besides, my desktop program makes it way easier to add Amazon links, check word count, and post the same post to multiple blogs--if I were so inclined--than if I was working from within a browser menu.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it&#8217;s funny, but I just moved to a desktop reader, after using Google Reader for the last year. And I&#8217;m not particularly liking it either, because the only reason I wanted to move to a desktop reader was that when I star something in the Reader, it just stayed there, and I did nothing with it. With the desktop reader, I can flag it and send it to my desktop blog publisher super easy, which is something that I had been looking for.</p>
<p>And for the desktop blog publisher&#8211;I agree with Christian. I often write posts when I&#8217;m no where near an internet connection, but also I like being able to have a program in the background, easily able to click over to when the urge to write strikes. Most of my posts are in draft form for over two hours, and I nearly never have my browser open for that long. Also, I find that I spend more time on my posts, and double check my grammar and spelling more than I do when I &#8220;compose on the fly&#8221; in the blog admin menu. </p>
<p>(And besides, my desktop program makes it way easier to add Amazon links, check word count, and post the same post to multiple blogs&#8211;if I were so inclined&#8211;than if I was working from within a browser menu.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Mohn</title>
		<link>http://pieceofshep.com/2008/01/moving-to-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-14540</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Mohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeschepker.com/blog/2008/01/moving-to-the-desktop/#comment-14540</guid>
		<description>Well, BlogBridge (a java rss reader) lets you synchronize your read count as well as the feeds. Very useful. I do use NetVibes a lot instead though.

As for blog publishing apps, well I do like (some of) them. Mainly because it enables me to use a different workflow than using the blog apps interface. I like being able to work offline, if I&#039;m traveling or otherwise without a live connection. Also, there is something to be said to working with an application that has spell checking etc. Firefox has that now though, so that point is moot. Ok, now I&#039;m rambling. See, if I wrote this comment using an editor instead of your comment form, I would probably be more coherent. Or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, BlogBridge (a java rss reader) lets you synchronize your read count as well as the feeds. Very useful. I do use NetVibes a lot instead though.</p>
<p>As for blog publishing apps, well I do like (some of) them. Mainly because it enables me to use a different workflow than using the blog apps interface. I like being able to work offline, if I&#8217;m traveling or otherwise without a live connection. Also, there is something to be said to working with an application that has spell checking etc. Firefox has that now though, so that point is moot. Ok, now I&#8217;m rambling. See, if I wrote this comment using an editor instead of your comment form, I would probably be more coherent. Or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shep</title>
		<link>http://pieceofshep.com/2008/01/moving-to-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-14539</link>
		<dc:creator>shep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeschepker.com/blog/2008/01/moving-to-the-desktop/#comment-14539</guid>
		<description>yeah, i can understand it for mobile devices because the native app will be better on the phone than using a browser would (in most cases i would assume this is true).  I just don&#039;t understand it on computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i can understand it for mobile devices because the native app will be better on the phone than using a browser would (in most cases i would assume this is true).  I just don&#8217;t understand it on computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skippy</title>
		<link>http://pieceofshep.com/2008/01/moving-to-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-14537</link>
		<dc:creator>skippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeschepker.com/blog/2008/01/moving-to-the-desktop/#comment-14537</guid>
		<description>I use GMail&#039;s IMAP service from my Palm Treo.  Although I can use the web-based interface, I find a native IMAP protocol to be much more efficient on this limited device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use GMail&#8217;s IMAP service from my Palm Treo.  Although I can use the web-based interface, I find a native IMAP protocol to be much more efficient on this limited device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
